Additive manufacturing technologies are increasingly used in the construction of machines, means of transportation and many other products. In aircraft construction, for example Metallic 3-D printing opens entirely new possibilities for weight reduction, and consequently the reduction of kerosene consumption.
Parts that previously had to be assembled from dozens of individual components can now be manufactured directly in one piece. Advances in the development of additive manufacturing allow more and more parts to be produced in large quantities by 3D printing.
Metal Powders used for additive manufacturing must meet the highest quality standards: The particle size distribution should be narrow and must be known as precisely as possible in order to control the behavior of the material during the sintering process.
MICROTRAC particle analyzers are ideally suited to determine the particle size distribution of metal powders used for additive manufacturing processes. The following provides an introduction to the suitable measuring technologies, general considerations as well as different examples of metal powder particle characterization.
In additive manufacturing, the particle size range of the powder used usually lies between 20 and 80 μm. Dust, non-spherical particles or large, fused grains disturb the manufacturing process and can cause defects in the component.
Since only a small portion of the powder is incorporated in the component, there is inevitably a lot of powder left over which is reused for the next process. Whether the recycled powder still meets the high quality requirements is one of the most important questions in the analysis of metal powders.
Microtrac offers two different technologies for the particle size characterization of metal powders: Laser Diffraction and Dynamic Image Analysis. Both methods provide a size distribution, but only imaging methods also detect the particle shape which is crucial for the suitability of a powder for additive manufacturing. Whereas Microtrac's CAMSIZER series is a range of dedicated image analysis devices, the SYNC combines Laser Diffraction and Dynamic Image Analysis in a unique way.
Another powder metallurgical process that is particularly suitable to produce small components with complex geometry in large quantities is Metal Injection Molding (MIM). With a particle size of typically 1-10 μm, the powders used for this process are even finer than those used for additive manufacturing. With Microtrac technology and equipment, however, even these fine powders can be analyzed without any problems.
With Dynamic Image Analysis, a particle stream is generated which is guided past a camera system. The resulting particle images are transferred directly to a PC and are evaluated in real time. The sample moves either in an air stream or in liquid.
The CAMSIZER X2 with a measuring range from 0.8 μm to 8 mm and an image acquisition rate of over 300 frames / second is particularly suitable for fine metal powders, as required in additive manufacturing.
Laser diffraction is the standard method for determining particle size distributions in many industries. This technique can also analyze particles in an air stream or as a suspension in a liquid.
The measuring method is based on the principle that laser light is diffracted or scattered at different angles from particles of different sizes. The calculation of the size distribution is based on the analysis of the scattered light patterns.
The strength of the measuring method lies in its high flexibility, easy handling and the extremely wide measuring range of 10 nm to 4 mm. However, laser diffraction is not suitable to determine the particle shape.
For this reason, Microtrac has equipped its powerful laser diffraction analyzer SYNC with an additional camera module based on the principle of dynamic image analysis. This uses the same measuring cell and the same dispersion system as for scattered light analysis.
Four metal powders were analyzed with both measuring instruments, CAMSIZER X2 and SYNC. The size distributions show the same trend: Sample 1 and 2 are relatively fine powders with a median of about 30 μm, whereas sample 1 contains particles < 20 μm which are missing in sample 2. It is noticeable that in the CAMSIZER analysis the fine fraction of sample 1 is measured in a clearly separated way (bimodal), whereas the laser result shows a gradual transition. Samples 3 and 4 are coarser, but similar to each other. Fig. 4 and 5 show the size results of image analysis and laser diffraction.
With image analysis using the CAMSIZER X2, three size distributions can be determined for each sample, based on the width, length and diameter of the equal area circle (xarea) of each particle projection. If the particles are approximately spherical, like samples 1 and 2, these three distribution curves are almost congruent. If the sample contains non-spherical particles, as in material 3 and 4, the distributions for length, width and xarea are different. The more irregular the particle shape, the further apart the curves lie. Laser diffraction does not distinguish between length and width, all measurement signals are related to the diameter of the equivalent sphere. The size distribution consequently lies between the length and width distribution of the image analysis results (Fig. 6 below).
Sample 2 was screened at 50 μm, so no particles above this size should be present. In the CAMSIZER analysis the distribution follows the expected behavior: the curves reach 100% at 50 μm. Only in the case of the length measurement some % larger than 50 μm are detected. Since the particles pass through the apertures of a sievewith their smallest projection area, the width of these particles is less than 50 μm, but they can still be longer!
Here, the laser measurement even shows about 5 % particles larger than 50 μm. If, however, the image evaluation function is used on the SYNC analyzer, the sharp separation at 50 μm also evident here. This shows that by using the image evaluation function with the SYNC, the upper limit of the distribution can be detected with similar accuracy as with the CAMSIZER. A laser analyzer without integrated image evaluation does not have this possibility!
Many production processes, including additive manufacturing, are sensitive to small quantities of large particles (oversize). In metal powders, for example, these large particles can lead to cavities or weak points in the end product.
Simply determining the average or mean particle size is not enough to predict manufacturing performance. The volume of particles larger than a certain limit size must be carefully monitored. It is possible to define a specification that no more than a small fraction of the particles can be larger than a critical size.
For example, you could require that no more than 0.01% by volume of the particles are larger than 200 microns.In this measurement example, a sample of metal powder with different amounts of impurities (oversize particles) was gravimetrically prepared and the resulting size distributions were measured to illustrate how the high-speed dual camera system of the CAMSIZER X2 can be used to find small amounts of impurities with large particles
A metal powder sample was first sieved through a 200 μm test sieve to ensure the removal of large contaminants. This screened powder was then weighed and a small amount of large particles was added in a controlled manner. This resulted in a series of samples with known amounts of impurities. Concentrations were 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2% and 1% (mass % each). The sample quantities for analysis were approximately 35-40 grams. Fig. 9, Fig. 10, and the table show how accurately the oversize grain can be detected with the CAMSIZER.
% oversize> 200 μm added | % oversize>200 μm detected by CAMSIZER X2 | Difference |
0.005 % | 0.005 % | 0.000 % |
0.010 % | 0.013 % | 0.003 % |
0.020 % | 0.019 % | 0.001 % |
0.050 % | 0.054 % | 0.004 % |
0.100 % | 0.107 % | 0.007 % |
0.200 % | 0.201 % | 0.001 % |
1.000 % | 0.936 % | 0.064 % |
In Laser Diffraction, it is assumed that under favorable conditions oversized particles can be detected if the percentage is >2 % by volume. Laser diffraction evaluates a signal generated by all particles simultaneously. This is therefore referred to as a collective measurement method, as opposed to an individual particle measurement method such as image analysis in which each particle detected generates a measurement value. In laser diffraction, if the proportion of a certain fraction is too small, the contribution of these particles to the total scattered light signal is also too small to be distinguishable from background noise. This situation cannot be compensated for by measuring larger sample quantities.
The combination of image analysis and laser diffraction improves the detection probability of impurities, but the performance here does not come close to that of a specialized dynamic image analyzer like the CAMSIZER X2. This is mainly due to the image acquisition rate of the CAMSIZER X2 which is 14 times higher. The dispersing system, sample feed and instrument setup of the SYNC are optimized to generate high quality scattered light data in a short time with the additional possibility of image acquisition. The entire hardware of the CAMSIZER X2, i.e. dispersion, sample feed, light sources and cameras, is optimized to acquire and evaluate many images in a short time. The number of particles evaluated, as well as the total amount of sample material used is considerably larger with the CAMSIZER X2.
Nevertheless, the SYNC is clearly superior to other laser analyzers with regard to the detection of oversized particles thanks to the advanced image evaluation.
Unser Expertenteam berät Sie gerne zu Ihrer Applikation und über unser Produktprogramm.